Skip to main content

Comparison of modelling methodologies for large porous absorbers hanging in a volume

Buy Article:

$15.00 + tax (Refund Policy)

Porous material simulation methodologies are well established. However, most methods, like the Transfer-Matrix Method (TMM) make the assumption that there is a source side and a receiver side. In practice, this works for the majority of industrial noise control treatments. For architectural applications, this is not always the case. Hanging absorbers and curtains are common materials that add absorption to a space, but do not have a boundary condition at a wall or a well-defined source and receiver side. To evaluate the validity of existing simulation methods for this condition, a reverb room test was simulated with a large cube of melamine foam inside the volume. The effective absorption of the cube in the space was then calculated using various simulation methodologies, and compared to results from a measured reverb room absorption test.

The requested document is freely available to subscribers. Users without a subscription can purchase this article.

Sign in

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Soundcoat

Publication date: 14 July 2024

More about this publication?
  • The Noise-Con conference proceedings are sponsored by INCE/USA and the Inter-Noise proceedings by I-INCE. NOVEM (Noise and Vibration Emerging Methods) conference proceedings are included. All NoiseCon Proceedings one year or older are free to download. InterNoise proceedings from outside the USA older than 10 years are free to download. Others are free to INCE/USA members and member societies of I-INCE.

  • Membership Information
  • INCE Subject Classification
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content