@article {Can:2016:0736-2935:775,
title = "Comparison of noise indicators in an urban context",
journal = "INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings",
parent_itemid = "infobike://ince/incecp",
publishercode ="ince",
year = "2016",
volume = "253",
number = "8",
publication date ="2016-08-21T00:00:00",
pages = "775-783",
itemtype = "ARTICLE",
issn = "0736-2935",
url = "https://ince.publisher.ingentaconnect.com/content/ince/incecp/2016/00000253/00000008/art00086",
author = "Can, Arnaud and Michel, Sven and De Coensel, Bert and Ribeiro, Carlos and Botteldooren, Dick and Lavandier, Catherine",
abstract = "Noise is a major environmental issue, which gave birth in the last decades to the development of many engineering methods dedicated to both its estimation and mitigation. The specificity of the noise pollution problem lies in the complexity of human hearing and subjective assessment,
and in the high spatiotemporal variation and rich spectral content of the noise generated by a wide variety of sources in urban context. Indicators that encompass all these dimensions are required for the description of sound environments and for the evaluation of noise mitigation strategies.
This paper compares usual and more specific indicators, dedicated to environmental noise analyses, by means of a literature review and through an analysis of a large database of physical and perceptive measurements collected in Paris, France. The comparison is based on the three following
criteria: i) the ability of indicators to describe and physically categorize the urban sound environments, ii) the relevance of indicators for describing the perceptive appreciations of urban sound environments, iii) the ability of indicators to be estimated through classical or more advanced
traffic noise estimation models. A discussion compares the pro and cons of the selected indicators in an operational scope.",
}